Exploration of how governments, bureaucracies that define how to communicate with citizens and how citizens are manipulated for political and economic, I learned that there are a lot of confusion in the average citizen to receive training by governments and the power available to those governments.
A good example is the lack of understanding of our historical foundations. The Europeans discovered America and findIslands more than 250 years before some of the British colonies seceded from the British Empire and founded their own governments. approved for more than two and a half centuries the laws of Great Britain, along with the colonial laws, followed by Great Britain, where the citizens of their social structure, economic and political. With the development of the colonial economy and the growing wealth of resources for manufacturers and retailers, England constantly taxed the colonies of their productive work andResources. Economic inequality with England, reinforced by social and political differences between Britain and the colonies, was the motivation for colonial self-determination and the desire for complete control and ownership of the wealth of the colonies produced.
Thus, the Declaration of Independence was born, a very remarkable document whose validity can not be sustained in any court, as it is a court that the wording could recognize as valid court elderly. The Authoritysupported by those who wrote them, this document is placed above all others. However, the American Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights, are to all opposition so much that they are mutually exclusive authorities of the other to provide the vehicle through the business promotion and safeguarding of its government, the 'authority to impose one, to deny the authority of others. It 's impossible to believe that these two documents are validexclusive in their philosophies.
From the Declaration of Independence:
"When in the course of human events, it is for a people, the political bands which have connected to dissolve with others, and among the powers of the earth, take the necessary, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and God , Nature they are entitled ,...} {... that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit ofhappiness. to secure that to secure these rights, governments are among the people, their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government in these objectives is damaging the people's right to change or to abolish it, and a new government agency, through its foundation on such principles and their powers in such form that it seems most Part of the effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate thatGovernments long established are not changed for light and transient, and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing, always the same object is a design, expressed to them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw up such Government, and to offerNew guards for their future security .}.....{ us to do so, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, to name and should be celebrated by the authorities of the good People of these Colonies known and declare that these United Colonies are, and the rule of law, free and independent, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown and that allpolitical connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and must be completely dissolved and that as Free and Independent States, they have full power to make war, peace concluded alliances for trade and all other acts and things , the Independent States may of right do. And in support of this Declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacredHonor. "
That sounds pretty strong stuff. Because the colonies that were present as the Third World countries treated their intentions and actions in order to justify the following do? Especially because the validity established by the government for the many functions of government are controlled by a public body must follow. When the British people and others who have colonized the world, governed by the authority of their king or queen and Parliament. They forced their authority bytheir army and navy. The American colonists were equal to or greater than some authorities to justify their illegal rebellion, and continued to support the authority of the Creator. The statement informs us that the elected representatives of some of the settlers had been authorized by some elements of their government to dump the British colony and form an independent government for all. Because you're white, male, and an owner had only one component,unlikely to be a natural law or divine authority from a limited group.
The authors of the declaration have informed us that the "laws of nature and nature's God 'right to self-determination, that talented people by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that these authors appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world claim to validity for their actions and who have prayed for the protection of Divine Providence for their activities. These authorsrequest were, in fact, divine authority for their intentions. Ordinary citizens of the time had no power. Over 200 years later, it remains unclear whether the authority of the Creator is a shot to do, or if a group of people who are willing to exercise self-determination can also use this authority exquisite.
Oddly enough, it could decide the U.S. Supreme Court on the legality of any formation of a government in a similar way. To exclude the possibility of such an actionmay interfere with a foreign power. To rule against such an action would be to deny their existence, and you so that all its decisions and nothing yet. The Supreme Court is limited to only whether a legal argument for the Court is constitutional under the Constitution of the United States. No constitution has the authority to cancel or annul the formation of other constitutions. The Supreme Court can not on the validity of the United States in generalConstitution itself, and therefore has no legal validity of the constitutional rule others. The legitimacy of the revolts and revolutions must always be determined by another judge, as we peacefully on Earth is based, namely the Court of war.
After having acquired the skills needed to justify their actions, the settlers then an army and a navy, after a long and difficult war, has been demonstrated in the British army and navy to increase notmore political and economic power of the British in the American colonies had to apply.
So what did this free, independent and self-determination to make colonies-these opportunities given by God to all peoples have the right to claim self-determination? They made a pact, Congress chose to appoint military might, and gave them the authority to join the colonial armies and fleets in an engine. After the war, they founded a new ContinentalCongress, which created a Constitution based on the authority of the Congress of the Confederation and its army and navy. They went to law, the law of God to justify the ban on creation of the government as illegal and illegally adopted. Now they would support the authority of the army and navy to any body of law that have chosen to see. They went to the Declaration of Independence and its recent 12 years of work and invalidatesacrifice.
Although we place great importance on our Declaration of Independence, we must understand that this declaration and all statements, irrelevant to all other groups, the exercise of political authority are. They serve only as red flags waved in the face of institutional authorities. Anyone who declared their independence from England in 1776, the promotion of and participation in a rebellion against established authority and legitimate. This type of action can only lead toThe Civil War. Both sides say they are patriots. But the traditional society, the rebel Revolutionary calls, and call the Revolutionary Government of the ruling despots and demagogues.
Our story has two examples of insurgency and civil war. The rebels declared their independence in 1776 by an army in order to establish the authority that comes from superior weapons. upper arms, but the Confederate States of America defeated in 1865, and therefore theirDeclaration of Independence was not able to make a date to determine the birth of a new country record.
The declarations of independence and constitutions are words on paper, they have no power. Since its inception of its existence and its authority occurs through the voluntary consent of citizens, or by force of arms to force dissidents to act in accordance with applicable law. A nation belongs to all day, with the consent or by force.
The followingExcerpts from the SU Constitution, to show the conflict between the Declaration and the Constitution.
Article 1, Section 8:
The Congress shall have power ...} {... To make a call by the militia laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions deliverables;
Article 1, Section 9:
The privilege of habeas corpus is not suspended, except when required in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety mayit.
Article 3, paragraph 1:
Grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and no state in any covenant agreement or confederation to coin money, emit bills of credit, make anything but gold and silver medal in a tender of payment debts, pass any law of attainder Ex post facto law, or legal obligation to impair any contract, or any title of nobility
No State shall, without the consent of Congress, of taxes and duties on imports or exports, apart from what can beabsolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws: and the net product of all duties and taxes that the set of all states of restrictions on imports or exports, is his use of the Treasury United States, and these laws are subject to review and control of Congress.
No State shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State or a foreign power, orEngage in War, unless actually invaded, or in imminent danger of not admit of delay.
Article 3, paragraph 3:
Treason against the United States, applies only to the war against them or supporting their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No one can of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses are sentenced to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Article 4, paragraph 3:
New States may be adopted by Congress in thisUnion, but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of another State nor a State from the intersection of two or more States or parts of them are made without the consent of the legislatures of the states involved and the Congress.
Congress has the power to have all the necessary rules and regulations respecting the territory or their property in the United States and nothing to damage the Constitution should be interpreted inall requests of the United States or of a particular state.
Article 4, paragraph 4:
The United States is for each Member State in this Union a republican form of government guarantee, and each of them to protect against the invasion and at the request of the legislature or the executive (when the legislature can not be convened) against domestic violence.
Article 5:
The Congress, if two-thirds of both houses is necessary to consider that, to propose amendments to thisConstitution or law enforcement, or two thirds of the Member is a convention of amendments, called valid in any case, for all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, if by ratifying legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or three quarters of their conventions, such as one or the other form of ratification will be proposed by Congress.
These are the different areas of constitutional law thatare in direct conflict with the guarantees of the Declaration. Article 1, Section 8, the national government has the right to form and lead the militia (armed forces), where "... bring to the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections ..." These laws are in conflict with all nations declared right to abolish the government itself, and declared its right to introduce new laws to determine their choice. The United States did the moral unlawfulness ofBritish armed forces to enforce unpopular laws. How quickly forget the founding fathers, that governments do not have the right to militarily suppress all citizens of a country, including their own. In addition, all governments have the right to delete any military efforts to divest the people of the old government, and the new government for their own benefit and happiness, it can not be right.
Article 1, § 9, we see that the constitution gives theauthority to arrest, the government suspending habeas corpus and the people, the Government believes that it is in turmoil. But the rebellion is declared a right of the Declaration and "Nature God" who called people the inalienable rights of life, can achieve the freedom guaranteed, and the pursuit of happiness. A law against rebellion is unpopular to admit that governments have the right to remove a ruler or a government by the majorityhas the right to oppress and suppress minorities, enslaving them to the will of others. popular governments, serves all the people need not fear the rebellion, and therefore no need for laws against them. The rebellion was a crucial midwife to the birth of this nation. not the conflict between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution can be greater than that with the right of rebellion finds. People will behave in the way the fashion of government, agree that they areeach other.
Article 1, § 10 of the Constitution explicitly the different states prohibit the exercise of rights, where the declaration to keep it, that all peoples have the right to choose how and join all the rights of an independent nation exercises were explained.
Article 3, paragraph 3, the constitution gives the government the right to its citizens accused of an act of treason, where acts of friendship towards nations commit defined byCongress, the enemies are. The Declaration of Independence, which guarantees any group of people the right to be independent and self-determination and to have "... have the power to make war, conclude peace, alliances ..." In other words, the Declaration does not commit an act of betrayal when establishing a new company.
Article 4, paragraph 3 of the Constitution gives the government the right to admit new states to the Union, but prohibits any state of the division, itsown, in several States. There is also the government the right to colonize and to assert its jurisdiction beyond the first limit. This is expressed not only inconsistent with the object of the Declaration is also the spirit of the Declaration. This section of the U.S. Constitution gives the right to wilderness area, a right that the American colonies against England, when he says rebelled colonize.
Article 4, paragraph 4, all states have a guaranteedrepublican form of government and protection against foreign and domestic violence. This is in contrast with the statement of the guarantee of the right of self-determination for all people. Included in the right to self-determination is the right of minorities to use violence if the republican form of government is oppressive or do not meet the needs of minorities. The Revolutionary War was fought because of the ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence, the opening ofPort for this type of action more and more.
Article 5 of the Constitution allows for amendments to be added to the Constitution to ratify the provision of three fourths of the states. This article, in contrast with the spirit of the declaration, because it can suppress majorities to minorities. The settlers shouted against taxation without representation. If the representatives of the English Parliament had sent on behalf of the settlers, would be the majority in Parliamentcanceled their petitions and charges anyway. Most of the settlers were seen as second-class British subjects, as the colonists watched the blacks and Indians as second class citizens. The right of majorities to suppress a change or refusal to exempt from the change may be Republican, but it is certainly immoral. E 'against the assertion of the right guaranteed by the separation and independence of minorities, especially when repair requests unanswered.
YouUnderstanding the Constitution is the declaration of independence, but the Constitution, followed by the Articles of Confederation. The federal government consists of the necessities of war, the colonies form a government, army and navy of the situation in the fight against the British increased. This raises the Constitution not in a position of authority over activities and furthered his education first. Thomas Paine, in his book Human Rights tells us that constitutionsbe formed and agreed upon, so that governments made to the laws on trade control and social activities to be taken. Governments do not open the way to compose a democratic environment. And the constitution, rather than precede, the independence of people who want to govern themselves. In all cases, to form a government of a people their independence from any other government to explain what the priorities for the realization of the power of government in the declaration. A declaration of independence is theFreedom of movement in the basic principle of government action, "Treat others as you want to do to you, we want to embody the wisdom to create a constitution and form a government to apply the wisdom of our interactions with socio-economic control.
The basic aim of a declaration of independence is to promote the establishment of the state. It is not ruled out any form of government. The Constitution to prohibit the other hand, not all activities relatedwith the idea of the government and separate from those of the U.S. government. The U.S. government is in any war in the establishment of independent government, as history has shown. We can only conclude that the mutual exclusivity of these documents rests entirely with the Constitution. There is no reason to justify the oppressive language in the Constitution. The government should respond to the will of the people. If there are conflicts,the will, there must be compromise and arbitration, or it must be the separation and the establishment of independent government.
Every company, every organization, every community, a Constitution, and expresses, explains the rules and statutes that create the way in which each group is to govern itself. And various other constitutions are desirable and necessary to meet the needs of human society. The defect of our national constitution, is that those whochosen to limit the public's confidence with the majority and the strength to attack and punish the person, where, over which they have no moral authority or earlier. Indeed, the Declaration of Independence, the former, that no authority, as may exist, but the pain and suffering of creation.
The inclusion of language in the Constitution, the authoritarian intervention by the majorities in political and social events being a minority makes theCancellation of American society. Majorities have been used for 200 years to keep the authority (often oppressive), separated by minorities, the formation of trade unions to vote, etc.
Because we live in community, and that our communities are often based on moral and ethical principles of behavior that is based on the various religious heritage must accept, we also pursue the political autonomy for the community to maintain our great alliance for social economic security andonly.
The Constitution is not a perfect instrument of government, but permanent changes in our social philosophies make it less perfect, but it was wrong to amend, as very difficult. Who is still alive, have chosen a representative to the Constituent Assembly? The representatives voted to keep any part of the Constitution, or chose items with new items that have more match to replace the social problems of today and obligations? TheirRepresentatives have an oath on a way to support the maintenance of government and therefore the legislation on education, which can not in conflict with the Constitution. Any law that is considered by judges to be in conflict must be empty and non-executive.
England should have a constitution, because any law passed by Parliament or cavity displaced old laws that conflict with the new law. Of people in England today, led by their representatives, expressed today, is theLaw and can not be replaced by the past. In the United States, the Constitution does not change, that 75% of different diets on the proposed changes are in agreement. A new law, not in conflict with the Constitution, it is only a simple majority to be right. A new law, by the people, but is rooted in conflict with the Constitution and reinforced by men long dead, lift desired unless amended the constitution to eliminate conflicts with the law. L 'should have the power to kill the envy of life.
Americans love their democratic heritage, often with reference to majority rule as the basis of our social laws. But do 74% of the living, desire for change in society's laws and how to keep themselves accountable, rather would benefit may not exceed the desires of 26%, which is more structured, while leaving the constitution as from the dead. This is not the majority rule, unless one of the dead that the living-wise and has a better positionhow to legislate, and the breadth and depth to make the laws.
Those who say that we are very heavy, suggests that we change the Constitution for any government by the people and for the people. They suggest that the groups to run our government and that some prosper at the expense of others. They want us to believe that the activity on a basis such as England, where all new laws would automatically be part of the Constitution, it wouldeasier for some fraction of the country and take full control of the rights of others. But in this case, the majority could quickly return to their sovereignty and authority only by amending the law. America is politically and economically by a political group that controlled the use in the near impossibility of changing the Constitution as a political shield for their economic power. The difficulty of amending the Constitution is not a curse and a blessing. And when social oppression continued,the Constitution shall be replaced for many declarations of independence.
We have allowed governments to the promotion and protection of our moral philosophies. Treated as the Constitution intended to create trade and external communication, in which different structures of political interface. But internally, so that our Constitution is the cover of individual opportunities to trade for the benefit of enterprises to control and morality are diluted.
If the Constitution is alivethen it must work for everyone. If you can not work for all people, then it must be modified to do this or new constitutions for the benefit and protection of communities who have in their interest to replace the self-determination. Self-determination too far in the definition of individual rights away, and not far enough in defining the rights of the community.
The Constitution of the author assumes that individuals always have the support of the community he or shebelonged to a movement or could support. Thus, the language of the Constitution and promoting personal development. But in today's world, people sync with their community does not move more harmonious situations. Instead, get the help of the courts and the language of the Constitution not only carry a single, but also a philosophy of non-local. They force the acceptance of their behavior in a community that has no desire of their presence. To align the individualis his only self-determination, a nation in itself. This is only a worthy goal of anarchists, and should not be a judicial or political objective of our government.
The prisoners claim that they have gone through a series of social rights is not the place for the Company's ability to create and maintain harmony are to be measured. prisons increasingly demonstrate a government office. These prisons are microcosms of the great prison, the company itself. While most ofThe citizens are caught in a political economic elite. Those who feel today arrested by the threat of violence against their person and property, at home and in public? The number of prisoners locked up a sign of growing social and economic despair, corruption in our society. We separate them in the hope that breaks clean, it is imperfect design, holding a political-industrial conspiracy of greed and profit instead of the imperfect socialFairness.
Here are some excerpts from Tom Paine's book "Human Rights". They are always present.
. "The reason and ignorance, facing each other, influence the great mass of humanity, if one of these can be great in a country, is the machinery of government obeys itself readily to the ground; .. Ignorance submits to what is dictated to it "
"Both the forms and maxims of Governments which were still in practice adapted to the statethe world at the time of its foundation, in this case is not the problem. The older they are, can not match with the current state of things.
Time and change of circumstances and opinions have the same progressive effect in rendering modes of Government obsolete they have on practices and customs. Agriculture, trade, production, and the peaceful arts of which the wealth of nations is best promoted, require a different system of government,and a different kind of knowledge was needed to guide its work, what could be the previous state of the world.
From what we see now, nothing should be in possession of the reform in the political world is unlikely. It 'an age of revolution, can be searched more. "
"It 's been established for the welfare of nations and not for the purchase or expansion of individuals, should be the government that the human race and are the responsibility ofto support it. The weaknesses of the various government and constitution, both in principle and form, must be on a parity of reasoning, so be open to discussion as the defects of the law, and it is a duty that every man owes to society to point them out. If these deficiencies and the means to solve them are usually of a nation, the government of the nation or the constitution in one case the reform, as they saw the government repealed or reformed the law in others. The operation of the governmentlimited to the preparation and administration of laws, but is a nation (the audience) that the right to form and reform, the production or regeneration, including constitutions and governments, and consequently those subjects, as subjects of investigations are always before a country as a matter of law, and can not, without invading the general rights of the country, made themes for the prosecution. "
© April 2009
Craig D. Hanks
No comments:
Post a Comment